Jump to content

KaLeuWillenbrock

Alpha Tester
  • Content count

    96
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

11 Good

About KaLeuWillenbrock

  • Rank
    Petty Officer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Would you like to see the Graf Zepplin in the game?

    not in its current state. first, we have to see what the CV reworks looks like.
  2. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Discord - all aboard!

    signed up on discord as well.
  3. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Community Contributors

    suuurpriiiise !!!
  4. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Intro FAQ

    is it possible, that long time clients get a discount on some premium ships?
  5. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Deutschsprachige Community

    und das meine ziert die Granaten.
  6. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Intro FAQ

    i heard, that microsoft is working on the matter but nonetheless. working controller support and controls are vital, because not every console player uses keyboard and mouse.
  7. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Where you from and what platform

    i am from germany and i am playing on the xbox one x as well. but i also play wows on PC.
  8. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Deutschsprachige Community

    Hey. Haben wir uns schon das ein oder andere mal gegenseitig versenkt? schön dich hier zu treffen!
  9. KaLeuWillenbrock

    The Wishlist

    Maybe even smaller matches in general. 10vs10 should be ok. 9vs9 would not be bad as well. this way, we could restrict the BBs and DDs to a maximum of three/two per side. i also hope, that we will get scenarios. They are actually fun to play and a good thing yo blow off steam.
  10. KaLeuWillenbrock

    The Wishlist

    its ok to have a limited amount of gimmicks. radar in its core it ok - if only one or two ships per side have it. If its more than that, it gets problematic. however - if you add a gimmick (jammer) to counter a gimmick (radar), that was added to counter a gimmick (smoke) things get out of line. thats the problem. nobody has a general problem with gimmicks - only with stupid ones, that try to compensate poor mechanics. the radar module made things worse and the new legendary upgrades (while the idea is great) are very likely to jump the shark for a lot of ships as well. if you want to give high tier ships different roles, add a second hull with different stats and maybe even armament. This way, you can unlock a second high tier ship to fit a different role.
  11. KaLeuWillenbrock

    The Wishlist

    i have a better proposition. how about radar lasts only 20 seconds for Russians and 25 for american ships. and give it a juicy cool down. This way, players parking their radar ships behind islands are a waste if they don't do anything else and us humble DD players stay on their toes instead of blindly rushing the cap. one thing is important. No stupid and overpowered gimmicks and counter gimmicks. This stuff gets old pretty fast. And no gamebreaking modules like the 40% radar thing.
  12. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Deutschsprachige Community

    nope. ich habe mein wows gametag gewählt.
  13. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Ship Lines in the Alpha

    das stimmt. Aber jemand hatte danach gefragt.
  14. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Intro FAQ

    That's right. i might add, that some of the ships will get new tiers. An iowa for example, could end up as a tier 7 BB, while a colorado could not even be in the game at all. this gives opportunities for new metas and combinations. I am excited
  15. KaLeuWillenbrock

    Ship Lines in the Alpha

    i dont think that the kitakami will be a part of the test. phil said that even the final game will "only" have seven tiers - which is absolutely enough if you ask me. In addition, the ship ls will be reshuffled to within the tiers. I guess that some paper ships will be taken out of the game. CVs will also be not a part of the test, because of the general CV rework.
×